1. Vashkevich A.M. Automation of law: law as electricity. M., 2019. P. 34–36 (in Russ.).
2. Gavrilov S.N. Russian legal mentality: procedural law vs people’s justice of customary law // Lex russica. 2021. Vol. 74. No. 10. P. 100–112 (in Russ.).
3. Golovanova E.I. Cognitive terminology: problems, tools, directions and prospects of development // Herald of the Chelyabinsk State University. 2013. No. 24 (315). Philosophy. Art history. Issue 82. P. 14 (in Russ.).
4. Zakhartsev S.I., Salnikov V.P. On integrative legal understanding in the context of a comprehensive theory of law // Legal science: history and modernity. 2017. No. 2. P. 42 (in Russ.).
5. Karsavin L.P. About personality. URL: https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=176812&p=40 (accessed: 28.12.2022) (in Russ.).
6. Kolesov V.V. “Life comes from the word ...”. SPb., 1999. P. 124, 125, 191–193 (in Russ.).
7. Kolesov V.V. Fundamentals of conceptology. SPb., 2019. P. 620–623 (in Russ.).
8. Kolesov V.V. Russian mentality in language and text. SPb., 2006. P. 13, 284, 393, 398, 413 (in Russ.).
9. Kolesov V.V., Kolesova D.V., Kharitonov A.A. Dictionary of Russian mentality: in 2 vols. SPb., 2014. Vol. 2 (P - Ya). P. 535 (in Russ.).
10. Lazarev V.V. Integrative perception of law // Lazarev V.V. Favorites of the last decade. M., 2020. P. 96 (in Russ.).
11. Lotman Yu. M. Three functions of the text // Lotman Yu. M. Inside thinking worlds. M., 1996. P. 11 - 22 (in Russ.).
12. Ponkin I.V. The concept of machine-readable and machine-executable law: relevance, purpose, place in PerText, content, ontology and prospects // International journal of open information technologies. 2020. Vol. 8. No. 10. P. 65 (in Russ.).
13. Taranova E.N. Problematics of modern theoretical terminology, achievements and shortcomings of terminological research // Scientific Bulletin of the Belgorod State University. Ser.: Humanities. 2011. No. 24 (119). Issue. 12. P. 148 (in Russ.).
Comments
No posts found