References

Additional sources and materials

1. Kiss L.W. Or. tit. P. 266-267; Maruta T. Or. tit. P. 216-217.  
 2. Kiss L.W. Reviving Criminal Jury in Japan // Law and Contemporary Problems. 1999. Vol. 62. № 2. P. 268     
 3. Maruta T. The Criminal Jury System in Imperial Japan and the Contemporary Argument for its Reintroduction // International Review of Penal Law. 2001. Vol. 72. Issue 1-2.  
 4. Kiss L.W. Or. sit. P. 267; sm. takzhe: Kodner J.J. Or. sit. P. 234-236.  
 5. Kodner J.J. Re-Introducing Lay Participation in Japanese Criminal Cases: An Awkward Yet Necessary Step // Washington University Global Studies Law Review. 2003. Vol. 2:23.  
 6. Fukurai H. The Rebirth of Japan's Petit Quasi-Jury and Grand Jury Systems: A Cross-National Analysis of Legal Consciousness and the Lay Participatory Experience in Japan and the U.S. // Cornell International Law Journal. 2007. № 40.  
 7. Kodner J.J. Or. sit. P. 244.  
 8. Anderson K., Saint E. Or. sit.  
 9. Tejman S. Reforma inkvizitsionnogo pravosudiya v Venesuehle. Sud prisyazhnykh ustupaet mesto sudu sheffe- nov // Ross. yustitsiya. 2002. S. 66-69.  
 10. Anderson K., Saint E. Or. sit. P. 234.  
 11. Levin D. Seiban-in-seido: Lost in Translation? How the source of power underlying Japan's proposed lay assessor system may determine its fate // <http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcon->tent.cgi?article=1000&context=douglas_levin. P. 47-49.