1. Gavrilov S.N. Methodology of machine perception of law based on a synectical approach // Journal of Russ. law. 2022. No. 12. P. 30 - 44 (in Russ.).
2. Gadzhiev G.A. Legitimization of the ideas of “Law and economics” (new cognitive structures for Civil Law) // Herald of Civil Law. 2017. No. 6. P. 108 - 173 (in Russ.).
3. Kostogryzov P.I. Legal anthropology in search of a paradigm // Scientific yearbook of IFiP UrO RAS. 2017. Iss. 4. Vol. 17. P. 81 - 99 (in Russ.).
4. Coen-Elia M., Porat I. The American method of weighing interests and the German proportionality test: historical roots // Comparative Constitutional Review. 2011. No. 3 (82). P. 59 - 81 (in Russ.).
5. Losev A.F. The history of ancient aesthetics: in 8 vols. Vol. 1. Early classics. M.; Kh., 2000 (in Russ.).
6. Losev A.F. Chaos and structure. M., 1997. P. 732 (in Russ.).
7. Pukhova T.B. Aesthetic foundations of law: abstract ... PhD in Law. Vladimir, 2008 (in Russ.).
8. Radbruch G. Philosophy of Law. M., 2004 (in Russ.).
9. Speech by A.A. Zaliznyak at the ceremony of awarding the literary prize of A. Solzhenitsyn // Ross. gaz. 2017. 28 Dec. P. 4 (in Russ.).
10. Fechner E. Philosophy of Law // Ross. the yearbook of the theory of law. 2010. No. 3. P. 565 (in Russ.).
11. Chalmers D. The conscious mind. In search of a fundamental theory. M., 2013. P. 55 (in Russ.).
12. Shniger D.O. Legal aesthetics, or law as art // Herald of Kutafin University (MGUA). 2020. No. 7 (71). P. 113 - 120 (in Russ.).
13. Davidson D. Mental Events. Reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford, 1970.
14. Fish S. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, Ma., 1980.
15. Gearey A. Law and Aesthetics (Legal Theory Today). Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, 2001.
16. Hart H.L.A. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford, 1983. P. 13.
17. Hart H.L.A. Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals // Harvard Law Review. Vol. 71. 1958. No. 4. P. 593–629.
18. Quine W. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York and London, 1969.
19. Schlag P. The Aesthetics of American Law // Harvard Law Review. 2002. No. 115. P. 1047–1116.
20. Tompkins J. P. Reader-response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-structuralism. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
21. Tyson L. Critical theory today: a user-friendly guide, 2nd ed. Routledge, New York and London, 2006.
22. Zeidler K. The Aesthetics of Law. Wolters Kluwer, 2020.
Comments
No posts found