1. Alisievich E.S. On the question of defining the concept of “vulnerable groups” in international human rights law // Eurasian legal journal. 2013. No. 1 (56). P. 29–33 (in Russ.).
2. Birtmontene T. The impact of the economic crisis on the constitutional doctrine of social rights // Constitutional Law and politics: materials of the International Scientific Conference. Faculty of Law of Lomonosov Moscow State University. March 28 - 30, 2012 / ed. by S.A. Avakyan. M., 2012. P. 718 (in Russ.).
3. Blankenagel A. Constitutional courts, social rights and the social state // Constitutional Law: Eastern European Review. 2003. No. 1 (42). P. 42 (in Russ.).
4. Varlamova N.V. Lockdown as a way of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis in the context of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights // Herald of the SPbU of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2020. No. 3 (87). P. 22 (in Russ.).
5. Vakhrusheva D., Baryshnikova A., Vdovenko I. et al. The situation of vulnerable groups during the spread of COVID-19 infection: needs and support measures: analytical report. M., 2020 (in Russ.).
6. Gomien D., Harris D., Zwaak L. The European Convention on Human Rights and the European Social Charter: law and practice. M., 1998. P. 494 (in Russ.).
7. Dolzhikov A. Constitutional social rights and their justiciability // Comparative Constitutional Review. 2019. No. 6 (133). P. 24, 33, 39 (in Russ.).
8. Mau V. Coronavirus pandemic and economic policy trends // Economic issues. 2021. No. 3. P. 6 (in Russ.).
9. Nesmeyanova S.E., Kalinina E.G. The concept of vulnerability of individual groups of persons: international and national experience // Russian law: education, practice, science. 2017. No. 4. P. 7 - 11 (in Russ.).
10. Smirnov S.N., Kolosnitsyn I.V. Social obligations of the state: reduction or restructuring? // The World of Russia. 2000. No. 1. P. 139–181 (in Russ.).
11. Snezhko O. Limits of legislative restrictions of social rights // Comparative Constitutional review. 2011. No. 2 (81). P. 37 (in Russ.).
12. Hirschl R. “Negative” Rights vs. “Positive” Entitlements: A Comparative Study of Judicical Interpretations of Rights in an Emerging Neo-Liberal Economic Order // Human Rights Quarterly. Vol. 22. 2000. No. 4. P. 1083 - 1086.
13. Hodgson T.F., Seiderman I. COVID-19 Responses and State Obligations Concerning the Right to Health (Part 2). URL: https://opiniojuris.org/2020/04/01/covid-19-symposium-covid-19-responses-and-state-obligations-concerning-the-right-to-health-part-2/ (accessed: 23.01.2022).
14. Mavronicola N. Positive Obligations in Crisis // Strasbourg Observers (7 April 2020). URL: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2020/04/07/positive-obligations-in-crisis/ (accessed: 15.01.2022).
15. Lebret A. COVID-19 pandemic and derogation to human right // Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 2020. P. 9.
16. Peroni L., Timmer А. Vulnerable groups: The promise of an emerging concept in European Human Rights Convention law // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2013. Vol. 11. Iss. 4. P. 1056 - 1085.
17. Shivani V. Justiciability of Economic Social and Cultural Rights Relevant Case Law Review Meeting / Rights and Responsibilities of Human Rights Organizations. Geneva, 15 March 2005.
18. The European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/economy-works-people/jobs-growth-and-investment/european-pillar-social-rights/european-pillar-social-rights-action-plan_en (accessed: 24.11.2021).
19. Zhebit A. Human Rights in a Pandemic // Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. 2020. Vol. 13. No 5. P. 227.
No posts found