Constitutional mythology: origination, purpose and practice of application (Part 1)
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Constitutional mythology: origination, purpose and practice of application (Part 1)
Annotation
PII
S013207690002200-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Igor Bartsits 
Affiliation: The Institute of Public Administration and Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Pages
56-70
Abstract

This article provides insight into the essence, content and destiny of constitutional myths and illusions as “load-bearing elements” of constitutional order, government system and political regime. Special attention is paid to the analysis of individual constitutional myths and illusions, such as the doctrine of the sovereignty of the people, concept of social contract, nation-wide referendum, values of separation of powers, open government, etc., as well as examples of their embodiment in the Constitutions of Russia, China, the USA, France, Venezuela, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Ukraine, etc. The author has identified key differences between the constitutional myths and constitutional illusions, including their sources, importance to the constitutional ideology, opposite temporal orientation, etc. He also substantiated the conclusion that the modern constitutional doctrine, because of its pragmatic nature and exclusive political focus, is designed to pursue practical political purposes, prevents the advent of new myths, and facilitates the dying out of constitutional illusions in the modern era.

Keywords
Constitution, constitutional myths, constitutional illusions, social contract, sovereignty of the people
Date of publication
22.12.2018
Number of purchasers
12
Views
1589
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2018
1

References

1. Guriev S. Mify ehkonomiki: zabluzhdeniya i stereotipy, kotorye rasprostranyayut SMI i politiki. 3-e izd., pererabot. M., 2010. S. 19.

2. President John F. Kennedy. Commencement Address At Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, June 11, 1962 // Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: John F. Kennedy, 1962. P. 234.

3. Tudor H. Political Myth. Macmillan Education, 1972. P. 13.

4. Marciano A. Introduction: Constitutional Myths // Constitutional Mythologies: New Perspectives on Controlling the State / ed. by A. Marciano. New York, 2011. P. 1, 2.

5. Shestov N.I. Politicheskij mif teper' i prezhde / pod red. A.I. Demidova. M., 2005. S. 57.

6. Friedrich C.J., Brzezinski Z.L. Totalitarian dictatorship and autocracy. New York, 1961. P. 99.

7. Mayakovskij V.V. Poslushajte! (sbornik). M., 2014. S. 1.

8. Krasnov M. Konstitutsiya v nashej zhizni // Proet Contra. 2007. № 4-5 (38). Iyul'–oktyabr'. S. 31.

9. Borisenko M.V. Rol' politicheskoj mifologii v sovremennoj politike // Vestnik MGU. Ser. “Sotsiologiya”. 2002. № 3. S. 26.

10. Ehliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. Izbr. raboty / per. s fr. i angl. M., 1987. S. 30.

11. Tarle E.V. Vzyatie Bastilii // Tarle E.V. Soch. T. VI. M., 1959. S. 647–658. Stat'ya napisana v 1939 g. k 150-letnemu yubileyu Velikoj frantsuzskoj revolyutsii.

12. Ray R. Constitutional myths: what we get wrong and how to get it right. New York, 2013. P. 1.

13. Norchi C.H. The legal architecture of nationbuilding: An introduction // Maine Law Review. 2008. Vol. 60:2. P. 289.

14. Epps G. Wrong and Dangerous: Ten Right Wing Myths about Our Constitution. New York, 2012. P. 15.

15. Hodgson G. The Myth of American Exceptionalism. New Haven and London, 2009. P. 104.

16. Sogrin V.V. Prinyatie Konstitutsii SShA: mify i real'nost' // Novaya i novejshaya istoriya. 1987. № 2. C. 41–57.

17. Beard Ch. A. An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. NewYork, 1913. P. 324.

18. Masterman R. The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution: Judicial Competence and Independence in the United Kingdom. Cambridge, 2010. P. 10.

19. Ponkin I.V. Sovremennoe svetskoe gosudarstvo. M., 2006.

20. Aldanov M.A. [Landau M.A.] Dva ehtyuda: 1. Ehrikh Lyudendorf. 2. Zhorzh Klemanso // Sovremennye zapiski. Kn. V. 1921. S. 169.

21. Linn Dzh., Dzhej Ehn. Da, gospodin ministr. M., 1989. S. 152.

22. Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. T. 134. S. 33.

23. Saltykov-Schedrin M.E. Sobr. soch.: v 20 t. T. 12. M., 1971.

24. Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. T. 134. S. 33.

25. Medushevskij A.N. (sost.) Konstitutsionnye proekty v Rossii XVIII – nachala XX veka. M., 2010. S. 81.

26. Koretskaya T.P. Stanovlenie rossijskogo konstitutsionalizma // Vestnik Omsk. un-ta. Ser. “Pravo”. 2013. № 3. S. 49–56.

27. Dnevniki imperatora Nikolaya II / obsch. red. i predisl. K.F. Shatsillo. M., 1991. S. 285.

28. Sholom-Alejkhem. Novostej nikakikh… // Sholom-Alejkhem. Tev'e-Molochnik. Povesti i rasskazy / per s evr. M., 1969. S. 438, 439.

29. Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. T. 16. S. 60.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate